UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins

Rajabi, Hadi; Denny, Michael; Karagiannopoulos, Kostas; Petridis, Haralampos; (2024) Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins. Materials , 17 (19) , Article 4749. 10.3390/ma17194749. Green open access

[thumbnail of 2024_Materials-Flex strength and wear of injectable composites.pdf]
Preview
PDF
2024_Materials-Flex strength and wear of injectable composites.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

(1) Objectives: This study investigated and compared the wear and flexural strength of two highly filled (injectable), one flowable and one paste composite. (2) Methods: Two highly filled flowable composites (G-aenial Universal Injectable and Beautifil Plus F00), a paste composite (Empress Direct) and a conventional flowable (Tetric EvoFlow) were tested. A two-body wear test was carried out using 10 disc-shaped samples from each group, which were subjected to 200,000 wear machine cycles to simulate wear, followed by Scanning Electron Microscope analysis. Flexural strength was tested using a three-point bend test using 15 beam samples for each of the four groups. Values were statistically compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for flexural strength and a Kruskal–Wallis test for wear. (3) Results: The median volume loss for G-aenial Universal Injectable and Beautifil Plus F00 was statistically lower than that of both Empress Direct and Tetric EvoFlow. For flexural strength the two highly filled flowable composites both exhibited statistically higher mean flexural strength values compared to Empress Direct (p < 0.004) and Tetric Evoflow (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the values of wear and flexural strength between the two highly filled flowable composites. (4) Conclusions/significance: Highly filled flowable composite resins with nano filler particles outperformed a conventional flowable and a paste composite resin in terms of wear resistance and flexural strength, and may be suitable to use in occlusal, load-bearing areas.

Type: Article
Title: Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins
Location: Switzerland
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.3390/ma17194749
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17194749
Language: English
Additional information: © 2024 by the Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: dental composite resin; wear; flexural strength; injectable resin; flowable resin; composite resin paste; highly filled flowable resin; dental materials; polymers; mechanical properties
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > Restorative Dental Sciences
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10199365
Downloads since deposit
78Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item