UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Responsible Digital ID: Effects of Data Governance Policies and Practices on Human Rights. Case Studies from Argentina, Estonia, Kenya, and China

Brandie, Nonnecke; Ruhrmann, Henriette; Sampson Geroski, Andreas; (2019) Responsible Digital ID: Effects of Data Governance Policies and Practices on Human Rights. Case Studies from Argentina, Estonia, Kenya, and China. CITRIS and the Banatao Institute

[thumbnail of Responsible-Digital-ID_CITRIS-Policy-Lab_September-2019.pdf] Text
Responsible-Digital-ID_CITRIS-Policy-Lab_September-2019.pdf - Published Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff

Download (1MB)

Abstract

An estimated 1 billion people lack formal identification globally, restricting their ability to meaningfully participate in the economy and society.1 In response, national digital identity (DID) systems are rapidly being deployed by a variety of actors and institutions to provide individuals with formal means of establishing their identity (ID). While these DID systems have the potential to hold great value to individuals, lack of sound data governance policies and practices present risks to individual civil and political rights. Through an analysis of national DID systems in Argentina, Estonia, Kenya, and China, we investigate how data governance policies and practices affect civil and political rights within the areas of data protection, political participation, and inclusion of diverse ethnic identities. We conclude with priority recommendations for national DID system data governance policies and practices that should be implemented to support civil and political rights, including: • Legally binding privacy standards for DID data collection, use, and sharing; • Cybersecurity standards and use of Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs) for data collection and use; • Robust and inclusive mechanisms to enable public consultation, auditing, and objection to data collection and use; • Restrictions on use of data to track political ideology and civic behavior; and • Regulatory and technical safeguards for the collection and use of data on vulnerable and marginalized populations. Institutions deploying DID systems should put in place an iterative and multistakeholder review process informed by these recommendations. This process will equip stakeholders to consider the human rights impacts of data governance policies and practices throughout the life cycle of the DID system. National DID systems hold great promise to support an equitable and thriving society, but only if these systems are built on human rights-driven data governance policies and practices.

Type: Report
Title: Responsible Digital ID: Effects of Data Governance Policies and Practices on Human Rights. Case Studies from Argentina, Estonia, Kenya, and China
Publisher version: https://citris-uc.org/research/citris-policy-lab/p...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > STEaPP
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10202891
Downloads since deposit
17Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item