UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Erring on the Side of Caution : Two Failures to Replicate the Derring Effect

Mera, Yeray; Modirrousta-Galian, Ariana; Thomas, Gemma; Higham, Philip A; Seabrooke, Tina; (2025) Erring on the Side of Caution : Two Failures to Replicate the Derring Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 10.1037/xge0001707. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Erring on the Side of Caution - Two Failures to Replicate the Derring Effect.pdf]
Preview
Text
Erring on the Side of Caution - Two Failures to Replicate the Derring Effect.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (438kB) | Preview

Abstract

It has been claimed that deliberately making errors while studying, even when the correct answers are provided, can enhance memory for the correct answers, a phenomenon termed the derring effect. Such deliberate erring has been shown to outperform other learning techniques, including copying and underlining, elaborative studying with concept mapping, and synonym generation. To date, however, the derring effect has only been demonstrated by a single group of researchers and in a single population of participants. This article presents two independent, preregistered replication attempts of the derring effect. In Experiment 1, participants studied 36 term–definition concepts in a within-subjects, laboratory study. On error-correction trials, participants were presented with a term–definition concept and were asked to generate an incorrect definition before correcting it. Error-correction trials were compared with copy trials, where participants simply copied the term–definition concepts and underlined the key concepts. Experiment 2 was an online study in which participants studied trivia facts using a similar protocol. Memory for the studied facts was then tested either immediately (Experiments 1 and 2) or after 2 days (Experiment 1). Unlike the original demonstrations of the derring effect, cued-recall performance did not significantly differ between the error-correction and copy conditions, and the Bayes factors provided moderate support for the null hypothesis in both experiments. We discuss potential explanations for our findings and consider them in relation to key theories and the broader literature on the role of errors in learning.

Type: Article
Title: Erring on the Side of Caution : Two Failures to Replicate the Derring Effect
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1037/xge0001707
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001707
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: derring effect, error correction, concept learning, deliberate errors, error generation
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10203955
Downloads since deposit
8Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item