Wright-Hughes, Alex;
Farrin, Amanda J;
Fonagy, Peter;
Ougrin, Dennis;
Stahl, Daniel;
Wright, Judy;
Irving, Donna;
... Cottrell, David; + view all
(2025)
Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis: Reducing Self-Harm in Adolescents: Pooled Treatment Effects, Study, Treatment and Participant Moderators.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
10.1016/j.jaac.2025.01.017.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Fonagy_RISAIPD R1_Jan2025_Clean.pdf Download (847kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective: Self-harm is common in adolescents and a major public health concern. Evidence for effective interventions that stop repetition is lacking. This individual-participant-data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to provide robust estimates of therapeutic intervention effects and explore which treatments are best suited to different subgroups. // Method: We searched databases and trial registers, to January-2022. RCTs compared therapeutic intervention to control, targeted adolescents aged 11-18 with a history of self-harm and receiving clinical care and reported on outcomes related to self-harm or suicide attempt. Primary outcome was repetition of self-harm at 12 months post-randomization . Two-stage random-effects IPD meta-analyses were conducted overall and by intervention. Secondary analyses incorporated aggregate data (AD) from RCTs without IPD. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019152119. // Results: We identified 39 eligible studies; 26 provided IPD (3,448 participants), 7 provided AD (698 participants). There was no evidence that intervention/s were more or less effective than controls at preventing repeat self-harm by 12 months in IPD (odds ratio (OR)=1.06 [95% CI 0.86, 1.31], studies=20, n=2,949) or IPD+AD (OR=1.02 [95% CI 0.82, 1.27], studies=22, n=3,117) meta-analyses and no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effects on study and treatment factors. Across all interventions, participants with multiple prior self-harm episodes showed evidence of improved treatment effect on self-harm repetition 6-12 months after randomization (OR=0.33 [95% CI 0.12, 0.94], studies=9, n=1,771). // Conclusion: This large-scale meta-analysis of RCTs provided no evidence that therapeutic intervention was more, or less, effective than control for reducing repeat self-harm. We observed evidence indicating more effective interventions within youth with two or more self-harm incidents. Funders and researchers need to agree on a core set of outcome measures to include in subsequent studies.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis: Reducing Self-Harm in Adolescents: Pooled Treatment Effects, Study, Treatment and Participant Moderators |
Location: | United States |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaac.2025.01.017 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.01.017 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Keywords: | Self-harm; suicide; adolescents; systematic review; ipd meta-analysis |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10204331 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |