UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Laboratory-assessed mistrust in borderline personality disorder: a meta-analytic review

Kurt, Yağızcan; Walker, Megan; Luyten, Patrick; Fonagy, Peter; (2025) Laboratory-assessed mistrust in borderline personality disorder: a meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment (In press).

[thumbnail of Luyten_ManuscriptPER_Revision2_withtitlepage.pdf] Text
Luyten_ManuscriptPER_Revision2_withtitlepage.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 24 October 2026.

Download (350kB)

Abstract

Background: Although a recent systematic review examined the relationship between mistrust and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) (Preti et al., 2023), it did not statistically quantify the strength of this association. This highlights the need for a meta-analytic review of mistrust in BPD. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis comparing laboratory-based assessments of mistrust between individuals with BPD and control groups. Methods: This meta-analysis was pre-registered with PROSPERO. The final database search was conducted on October 17, 2024, across EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies. We included studies published in English or translated into English that employed valid, reliable laboratory-based measures of mistrust and psychometrically sound tools for assessing BPD symptoms or features. A three-level meta-analytic model was used to assess mistrust differences between BPD and control groups. The risk of bias in the included records was evaluated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists. Findings: Our search yielded 1,717 reports, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria (N = 3,716). Based on 70 effect sizes from these reports, the meta-analysis indicated a small-to-moderate effect size (g = .44, 95% CI [.27, .61], p < .001), demonstrating that individuals with BPD exhibited significantly higher levels of mistrust compared to controls. Subgroup analyses identified the mistrust paradigm as a statistically significant moderator. Interpretation: These results underscore the significant role of mistrust in BPD. We suggest that assessing mistrust and fostering interpersonal trust during treatment could lead to more effective interventions for BPD.

Type: Article
Title: Laboratory-assessed mistrust in borderline personality disorder: a meta-analytic review
Publisher version: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/per
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Mistrust, distrust, trust game, trustworthiness appraisal, borderline personality disorder
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10207637
Downloads since deposit
4Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item