Blandford, A; Berndt, E; Furniss, D; O Kane, AA; Rajkomar, A; Catchpole, K; Mayer, A; ... Randell, R; + view all Blandford, A; Berndt, E; Furniss, D; O Kane, AA; Rajkomar, A; Catchpole, K; Mayer, A; Mentis, H; Owen, T; Randell, R; - view fewer (2014) Strategies for conducting situated studies of technology use in hospitals. Cognition, Technology and Work , 17 (4) pp. 489-502. 10.1007/s10111-014-0318-7.

Preview

PDF art%3A10.1007%2Fs10111-014-0318-7.pdf Download (264kB)

Abstract

Ethnographic methods are widely used for understanding situated practices with technology. When authors present their data gathering methods, they almost invariably focus on the bare essentials. These enable the reader to comprehend what was done, but leave the impression that setting up and conducting the study was straightforward. Text books present generic advice, but rarely focus on specific study contexts. In this paper, we focus on lessons learnt by non-clinical researchers studying technology use in hospitals: gaining access; developing good relations with clinicians and patients; being outsiders in healthcare settings; and managing the cultural divide between technology human factors and clinical practice. Drawing on case studies across various hospital settings, we present a repertoire of ways of working with people and technologies in these settings. These include engaging clinicians and patients effectively, taking an iterative approach to data gathering and being responsive to the demands and opportunities provided by the situation. The main contribution of this paper is to make visible many of the lessons we have learnt in conducting technology studies in healthcare, using these lessons to present strategies that other researchers can take up.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVJSONXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item