Kahan, BC;
Rushton, H;
Morris, TP;
Daniel, RM;
(2016)
A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
, 16
(42)
10.1186/s12874-016-0141-3.
Preview |
Text
Morris_art%3A10.1186%2Fs12874-016-0141-3.pdf Download (681kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Although covariate adjustment in the analysis of randomised trials can be beneficial, adjustment for continuous covariates is complicated by the fact that the association between covariate and outcome must be specified. Misspecification of this association can lead to reduced power, and potentially incorrect conclusions regarding treatment efficacy. / Methods: We compared several methods of adjustment to determine which is best when the association between covariate and outcome is unknown. We assessed (a) dichotomisation or categorisation; (b) assuming a linear association with outcome; (c) using fractional polynomials with one (FP1) or two (FP2) polynomial terms; and (d) using restricted cubic splines with 3 or 5 knots. We evaluated each method using simulation and through a re-analysis of trial datasets. / Results: Methods which kept covariates as continuous typically had higher power than methods which used categorisation. Dichotomisation, categorisation, and assuming a linear association all led to large reductions in power when the true association was non-linear. FP2 models and restricted cubic splines with 3 or 5 knots performed best overall. / Conclusions: For the analysis of randomised trials we recommend (1) adjusting for continuous covariates even if their association with outcome is unknown; (2) keeping covariates as continuous; and (3) using fractional polynomials with two polynomial terms or restricted cubic splines with 3 to 5 knots when a linear association is in doubt.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12874-016-0141-3 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0141-3 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | Copyright © Kahan et al. 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
| Keywords: | Randomised controlled trial, Covariate adjustment, Continuous variables, Fractional polynomials, Restricted cubic splines |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology > MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1482119 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
