Adam, S.;
Brewer, M.;
Wakefield, M.;
(2005)
Tax and benefit changes: who wins and who loses?
(IFS Election Briefing Notes
BN56A
).
Institute for Fiscal Studies: London, UK.
![]() Preview |
PDF
14868.pdf Download (75kB) |
Abstract
* Tax and benefit changes implemented by Labour since 1997 will have a net cost to the exchequer of around £2.2 billion in 2005-06. The average (mean) impact of this small net giveaway is to raise household disposable incomes by £1.69 a week or 0.4%. The biggest proportionate gains are in the 2nd poorest tenth of the population, whose disposable incomes are increased by 11.4%, while the richest tenth fare worst, with a cut in income of 3.7%. * Tax and benefit reforms since 1997 have clearly been progressive, benefiting the less well-off relative to the better-off. Reforms in the second term - while less generous on average - were more progressive than those in the first, with the poorest faring better. * Increases in council tax above inflation since 1997 will raise £5.8 billion in 2005-06, net of council tax benefit. This outweighs the giveaway by central government, and leaves households overall £2.85 a week worse off on average, equivalent to 0.6% of their disposable incomes. The increase in council tax is regressive, except for the poorest fifth of the population, who are partially protected from the rises by council tax benefit.
Type: | Report |
---|---|
Title: | Tax and benefit changes: who wins and who loses? |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/3351 |
Language: | English |
UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Economics |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14868 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |