Korpeoglu, E;
Ales, L;
Cho, SH;
(2017)
Optimal Award Scheme in Innovation Tournaments.
Operations Research
, 65
(3)
pp. 693-702.
10.1287/opre.2016.1575.
Preview |
Text
Korpeoglu_OptimalCompensation_Final.pdf Download (302kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In an innovation tournament, an organizer solicits innovative ideas from a number of independent agents. Agents exert effort to develop their solutions, but their outcomes are unknown due to technical uncertainty and/or subjective evaluation criteria. To incentivize agents to make their best effort, the organizer needs to devise a proper award scheme. While extant literature either assumes a winner-take-all scheme a priori or shows its optimality under specific distributions for uncertainty, this paper derives necessary and sufficient conditions under which the winner-take-all scheme is optimal. These conditions are violated when agents perceive it very likely that only few agents receive high evaluation or when a tournament does not require substantial increase in agents’ marginal cost of effort to develop high-quality solutions. Yet, the winner-take-all scheme is optimal in many practical situations, especially when agents have symmetric beliefs about their evaluation. In this case, the organizer should offer a larger winner prize when he is interested in obtaining a higher number of good solutions, but interestingly the organizer need not necessarily raise the winner prize when anticipating more participants to a tournament. / The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1575.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Optimal Award Scheme in Innovation Tournaments |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1287/opre.2016.1575 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1575 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | games/group decisions; tournament; research and development; innovation |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > UCL School of Management |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1492916 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |