Jones, S; Lumens, J; Sohaib, SM; Finegold, JA; Kanagaratnam, P; Tanner, M; Duncan, E; ... BRAVO Investigators, .; + view all Jones, S; Lumens, J; Sohaib, SM; Finegold, JA; Kanagaratnam, P; Tanner, M; Duncan, E; Moore, P; Leyva, F; Frenneaux, M; Mason, M; Hughes, AD; Francis, DP; Whinnett, ZI; BRAVO Investigators, .; - view fewer (2017) Cardiac resynchronization therapy: mechanisms of action and scope for further improvement in cardiac function. Europace , 19 (7) pp. 1178-1186. 10.1093/europace/euw136.

Preview

Text Chaturvedi VoR euw136.pdf Download (512kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may exert its beneficial haemodynamic effect by improving ventricular synchrony and improving atrioventricular (AV) timing. The aim of this study was to establish the relative importance of the mechanisms through which CRT improves cardiac function and explore the potential for additional improvements with improved ventricular resynchronization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed simulations using the CircAdapt haemodynamic model and performed haemodynamic measurements while adjusting AV delay, at low and high heart rates, in 87 patients with CRT devices. We assessed QRS duration, presence of fusion, and haemodynamic response. The simulations suggest that intrinsic PR interval and the magnitude of reduction in ventricular activation determine the relative importance of the mechanisms of benefit. For example, if PR interval is 201 ms and LV activation time is reduced by 25 ms (typical for current CRT methods), then AV delay optimization is responsible for 69% of overall improvement. Reducing LV activation time by an additional 25 ms produced an additional 2.6 mmHg increase in blood pressure (30% of effect size observed with current CRT). In the clinical population, ventricular fusion significantly shortened QRS duration (Δ-27 ± 23 ms, P < 0.001) and improved systolic blood pressure (mean 2.5 mmHg increase). Ventricular fusion was present in 69% of patients, yet in 40% of patients with fusion, shortening AV delay (to a delay where fusion was not present) produced the optimal haemodynamic response. CONCLUSIONS: Improving LV preloading by shortening AV delay is an important mechanism through which cardiac function is improved with CRT. There is substantial scope for further improvement if methods for delivering more efficient ventricular resynchronization can be developed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our clinical data were obtained from a subpopulation of the British Randomised Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimisation (BRAVO), which is a registered clinical trial with unique identifier: NCT01258829, https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item