Rauch, SG;
(2017)
"The fundamental truths of the film remain": Researching individual reception of Holocaust films.
Forum, qualitative social research / Forum, Qualitative Sozialforschung
, 18
(2)
, Article 14. 10.17169/fqs-18.2.2721.
Preview |
Text
Rauch_2721-11728-2-PB.pdf - Published Version Download (274kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this article I will discuss empirical approaches to viewers' reception of films about the Holocaust. Existing studies tend to focus on the effects of, or responses to, one film or to one type of film, which results in skewed ideas about "Holocaust films" and their audiences. I will present a qualitative study of individual reception of feature films about the Holocaust I conducted in Britain, and demonstrate how a comparison of the reception of different films and genres can add to our understanding of their interpretation and impact. Differences and similarities in responses to feature films based on fictional narratives on the one hand and on "true stories" on the other hand, will be highlighted, while also taking into account viewers' interpretative communities. I will show that films based on true stories, especially if shot in a realist style, added more measurably to historical knowledge and understanding than those based on fiction, with the latter tending to be judged to different standards of authenticity. While viewers appeared to be able to recognise if a film is not primarily based on fact, they still expected a Holocaust film to be "true" in other ways.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | "The fundamental truths of the film remain": Researching individual reception of Holocaust films |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.17169/fqs-18.2.2721 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.2.2721 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright (c) 2017 Stefanie Rauch. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
Keywords: | Holocaust; film reception; grounded theory methodology; hermeneutic dialogue analysis; qualitative content analysis; NVivo; cultural studies; memory studies; history; media studies; Britain; education |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > SHS Faculty Office UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > SHS Faculty Office > UCL Institute for Advanced Studies |
URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1558069 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |