UCL Discovery Stage
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery Stage

Optimising implementation of a patient-assessment framework for emergency nurses: a mixed-method study

Munroe, B; Curtis, K; Buckley, T; Lewis, M; Atkins, L; (2017) Optimising implementation of a patient-assessment framework for emergency nurses: a mixed-method study. Journal of Clinical Medicine , 27 (1-2) e269-e286. 10.1111/jocn.13932. Green open access

[thumbnail of Atkins _Optimising implementation of a patient-assessment framework for emergency nurses. A mixed-method study_VoR (1).pdf]
Preview
Text
Atkins _Optimising implementation of a patient-assessment framework for emergency nurses. A mixed-method study_VoR (1).pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine potential facilitators and barriers and tailor interventions to optimise future implementation of a patient-assessment framework into emergency nursing practice. BACKGROUND: An evidence-informed patient-assessment framework HIRAID (History, Identify Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication and reassessment) improves the quality of patient assessments performed by emergency nurses. Facilitators and barriers must be understood and tailored interventions selected to optimise implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-method convergent study design was used. METHODS: Thirty eight early career emergency nurses from five Australian hospitals participated in an education workshop on the HIRAID assessment framework. Simulated clinical scenarios enabled participants to experience conducting a patient assessment with and without using the framework. All participants completed surveys, interviews and focus groups to identify potential facilitators and barriers. Twenty three participants completed follow-up telephone surveys four to six months later. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed separately using descriptive statistics and inductive content analysis, prior to integration. Implementation interventions were selected using the Behaviour Change Wheel. RESULTS: Nine facilitators and nine barriers were identified to potentially effect implementation of the HIRAID assessment framework. Twelve of the 23 participants (52.2%) who completed follow-up surveys reported using the framework in the clinical setting. To optimise future implementation, the education workshop needs refinement, and environmental restructuring, modelling and social support are required. CONCLUSION: A multimodal strategy is needed to promote future successful implementation of the HIRAID assessment framework into emergency nursing practice. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The successful implementation of the HIRAID assessment framework has the potential to improve nursing assessments of patients in emergency and other acute care settings. This study demonstrates how to systematically identify facilitators and barriers to behaviour change and select interventions to optimise implementation of evidence-informed nursing practices.

Type: Article
Title: Optimising implementation of a patient-assessment framework for emergency nurses: a mixed-method study
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13932
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13932
Language: English
Additional information: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. See here for more information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en
Keywords: Behaviour change theory, Emergency Department, Evidence-base practice, Implementation science, Nursing, Nursing assessment, Patient assessment
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1560726
Downloads since deposit
14,365Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item