Bentley, R.A.;
(2008)
Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: an evolutionary analysis of published keywords.
PLoS ONE
, 3
(8)
e3057.
10.1371/journal.pone.0003057.
![[thumbnail of 17283.pdf]](https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) Preview |
PDF
17283.pdf Download (363kB) |
Abstract
The evolution of vocabulary in academic publishing is characterized via keyword frequencies recorded in the ISI Web of Science citations database. In four distinct case-studies, evolutionary analysis of keyword frequency change through time is compared to a model of random copying used as the null hypothesis, such that selection may be identified against it. The case studies from the physical sciences indicate greater selection in keyword choice than in the social sciences. Similar evolutionary analyses can be applied to a wide range of phenomena; wherever the popularity of multiple items through time has been recorded, as with web searches, or sales of popular music and books, for example.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: an evolutionary analysis of published keywords |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003057 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003057 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © 2008 Bentley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited; see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ |
| URI: | https://discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/17283 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
